Repetitive Peripheral Sensory Stimulation as an Add-On Intervention for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke: A Randomized Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation (RPSS) followed by 4-hour task-specific training (TST) improves upper limb motor function in subjects with stroke who experience moderate to severe motor upper limb impairments. Here, we compared effects of RPSS vs sham followed by a shorter duration of training in subjects with moderate to severe motor impairments in the chronic phase after stroke. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial compared effects of 18 sessions of either 1.5 h of active RPSS or sham followed by a supervised session that included 45 min of TST of the paretic upper limb. In both groups, subjects were instructed to perform functional tasks at home, without supervision. The primary outcome measure was the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) after 6 weeks of treatment. Grasp and pinch strength were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analysis, WMFT improved significantly in both active and sham groups at 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. Grasp strength improved significantly in the active, but not in the sham group, at 3 and 6 weeks. Pinch strength improved significantly in both groups at 3 weeks, and only in the active group at 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The between-group difference in changes in WMFT was not statistically significant. Despite the short duration of supervised treatment, WMFT improved significantly in subjects treated with RPSS or sham. These findings are relevant to settings that impose constraints in duration of direct contact between therapists and patients. In addition, RPSS led to significant gains in hand strength.Trial Registry Name: Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Motor Training in Stroke Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT0265878 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02658578.

Powering strategies for implanted multi-function neuroprostheses for spinal cord injury.

Implantable motor neuroprosthetic systems can restore function to individuals with significant disabilities, such as spinal cord injury, stroke, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. Neuroprostheses provide restored functionality by electrically activating paralysed muscles in coordinated patterns that replicate (enable) controlled movement that was lost through injury or disease. It is important to consider the general topology of the implanted system itself. The authors demonstrate that the wired multipoint implant technology is practical and feasible as a basis for the development of implanted multi-function neuroprosthetic systems. The advantages of a centralised power supply are significant. Heating due to recharge can be mitigated by using an actively cooled external recharge coil. Using this approach, the time required to perform a full recharge was significantly reduced. This approach has been demonstrated as a practical option for regular clinical use of implanted neuroprostheses.

Combined Brain and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients With Moderate to Severe Motor Impairment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effects of somatosensory stimulation in the form of repetitive peripheral nerve sensory stimulation (RPSS) in combination with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), tDCS alone, RPSS alone, or sham RPSS + tDCS as add-on interventions to training of wrist extension with functional electrical stimulation (FES), in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe upper limb impairments in a crossover design. We hypothesized that the combination of RPSS and tDCS would enhance the effects of FES on active range of movement (ROM) of the paretic wrist to a greater extent than RPSS alone, tDCS alone or sham RPSS + tDCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary outcome was the active ROM of extension of the paretic wrist. Secondary outcomes were ROM of wrist flexion, grasp, and pinch strength of the paretic and nonparetic upper limbs, and ROM of wrist extension of the nonparetic wrist. Outcomes were blindly evaluated before and after each intervention. Analysis of variance with repeated measures with factors "session" and "time" was performed. RESULTS: After screening 2499 subjects, 22 were included. Data from 20 subjects were analyzed. There were significant effects of "time" for grasp force of the paretic limb and for ROM of wrist extension of the nonparetic limb, but no effects of "session" or interaction "session x time." There were no significant effects of "session," "time," or interaction "session x time" regarding other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Single sessions of PSS + tDCS, tDCS alone, or RPSS alone did not improve training effects in chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe impairment.